Do Minority Writers Have an Advantage?

Mulberry Street NYC ca.1900. edit of Image:Mul...

Mulberry Street NYC ca.1900. edit of Image:Mulberry Street NYC c1900 LOC 3g04637u.jpg by me user debivort. 1px median filtered, and then downsampled. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

American Readers Like Unconventional Characters, but…

In an article Amit Mujmudar wrote for the NY Times on May 5 entitled Am I an ‘Immigrant Writer‘?,  he explores writing for the American fiction reading world as a minority.    Almost immediately he concludes that “a minority author may well have an advantage”.  It stems from the American reader’s appetite for stories about people who live in “other” ways.  So, there is the element of novelty when readers pick up a book written by a minority author, but there’s also a rub:  readers want to see themselves in the characters they read about.  Is this a deal breaker?

 

Cover of "Monsoon Wedding"

Cover of Monsoon Wedding

Attaining the Universal Through the Particular

Mujmudar notes that minority writers in particular need to hurdle any divide whether it’s religion, geography, ethnicity or anything else that would prevent readers from recognizing themselves in the  characters of  a story.  It goes with the territory. My mind immediately leaps to movies. In the foreign movie Monsoon Wedding, audiences relish the novelty of the lush Indian music, sensuous dancing, and thoroughly Indian family participation in, and the lavish preparation for the wedding. But what carries the movie in the end, is the moral dilemma facing the father of the bride, a dilemma that all audiences recognize. The way in which the father resolves the dilemma resonates with all audiences, and together with his generosity toward lower class newly weds reveals a crack that is opening in the inborn Indian caste system.  Mujmudar writes “the book’s (or movie’s) success is proportional to the extent its cultural strangeness dissolves in the reading (or viewing).

Minority Threads

Minority Threads (Photo credit: simplyla)

Realism in Stories

Mujmudar points to the current of realism that runs through popular American literature of the day. Let me add theater and cinema to this.   Realism is enhanced by observed detail and authoritative voice provided by the author.  This works in favor of the author who can provide it.  Amit writes: “Readers don’t want differences to estrange them—for all their curiosity, they actually want the differences to disappear. They want to recognize themselves.”  The context of the immigrant writer begins to fade right about here.  In some sense, aren’t we all immigrant writers? If we follow the mantra of current realistic story telling, we write about what we know, about our own experience.  If we do it well, we can write as Amit says, “characters specific enough to be anyone”.

What novels, plays, movies can you cite that transcend the particular to achieve the universal?

 

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

12 Comments

  1. Hands down for me is how Steinbeck’s The Grapes of Wrath uses the particular case of the Joad family to shed light on the plight of the migrant worker. It’s one of my favorite books that makes a statement that stood up then and now.

  2. Hi Jeri – Like you, my thinking immediately went to the bigger picture on this. It really takes in any effort a writer makes to find ways to have a circumstance or a story (the particular) explain a larger truth. The Grapes of Wrath is an excellent example.

  3. I received this message from Mark Brody who wasn’t able to comment here. Still checking on that.
    Larry – I wasn’t able to comment on your blog, but wanted to let you know that I did enjoy your post. I agree that “stories” are much more interesting when individuals can identify with the characters. Immigrant or minority writers have to traverse the cultural and social divides into order to make their stories relatable to their audience, however, those that do, WOW!

    Thank you for sharing!!

  4. Thanks for commenting Mark. Minority writers may enjoy a “novelty” advantage. But they need to get ‘universal’ quickly. Sorry you couldn’t find a way to comment here.

  5. I think reading a book written from an author in a different ethnic background leads to education. We are curious creatures by nature and want to learn about things we are unfamiliar with. I think Minority writers provide that for us.

  6. “Aren’t we all immigrant writers?” Is a huge question, but I do agree. In the grand scheme we are writing what we know. As human beings we share much in common with other human beings. It is our journey through the world that reveals the differences.

  7. I so agree with the statement. “Realism is enhanced by observed detail and authoritative voice provided by the author.” It really can make the difference between good and great when it comes to any book or prose. Just my thoughts. 🙂

  8. Hi Elizabeth – We definitely can learn from minority authors. If we have an open mind that is. Do minority writers have an advantage? My vote is: yes, in the sense that the curious reader is drawn to something new to learn something. Thanks for your insight.

  9. And the differences are in the particulars. Athol Fugard’s play Master Harold and the Boys shows us inborn and blatant racism in South Africa. The play ran on Broadway for a long time mainly because a white American audience could see itself in the young man, Master Harold.

Comments are closed.